The goal of Gender Theorists is to do away with ALL sexual norms and standards. If they get their way, nothing is wrong.
But when children grow up highly sexualized and used to sex any time, anywhere, and with anyone, they will be victims of obsessive-compulsive behaviors, unable to live ordinary productive lives and enjoying a variety of interests - activities that are needed for a stable society.
This is dead on, and we are seeing the fruits of it already. Kids and young adults have fewer rules regarding sex than ever, their every hormonal whim or confused thought indulged with no judgement (nay, with celebration!), and yet depression, anxiety, and mental illness is skyrocketing. Young people are having a hard time leaving the nest or engaging with basic "adulting." It's terribly sad.
As a lesbian woman, I despise "Pride parades" for some of the reasons listed above and then some. I'm also glad to see "furries" acknowledged as the creepy perverts they are, because I'm tired of hearing that it's all innocent fun. No, it isn't. They're usually porn addicts into incest and zoophilia. It's vile, and I despise being lumped in with them.
However, some of this comes off to me as homophobic, particularly the part about how supporting a hypothetical gay uncle by going to Pride is a "bad reason".
Maybe I'm misreading it, but I'd like to remind everyone that Pride parades didn't used to be like this, and "LGBTQ" does not represent the majority of gays and lesbians anymore.
Pride parades used to be our way of saying we will not be shamed into silence nor hide our natural sexual orientation any longer. We are just like you, we're not degenerates or sinners, and we don't deserve to be denied basic human rights, imprisoned, assaulted, or killed for our sexuality.
However, modern day "Pride parades" are teeming with homophobic straight people (and sadly, some homosexuals and bisexuals too) with sexual fetishes who get sexual gratification from making everyone uncomfortable. Do not conflate us with them. They're the ones making their sexual fetishes (and made up "genders") into their whole identity.
Most of us gays and lesbians are not "kinky" or "deviant" or "sinful" - these perverts just believe we are, so they hijacked our movement and turned it into their public fetish display, sponsored by the nearest Fortune 500.
Also, to the lady holding up the "no book bans" sign - age restrictions on pornographic books are not book bans. You and every other homophobe-in-woke clothing made the public believe we're all creepy perverts again and then you have the audacity to cry "book ban" when parents don't want their 6 year olds reading books about children giving other children blowjobs? Give me a break.
But thanks for making every pedophile organizations dream come true - they've been working on getting adult content into schools since the 1970s! /s
Some honest feedback from a gay man who doesn’t care about “pride parades” but who is aware that the Massachusetts Bay Colony originated the death penalty for gay sex, usually called sodomy.
It took an astonishing about of work to convince me that the writer has an astonishing about of time on their hands.
I’d strongly recommend the writer consider why photographing (among other things) women’s breasts to ridicule and publishing them without their consent is a valuable activity to anyone.
This is level of obsession is beyond run-of-the mill prudery. Using children as a pretext for stalking and breathless drooling sexual compendia is… what’s the word…
Rest assured, we didn't photograph anyone, we found all of these pictures publicly posted online. The question you should be asking is, why do the people in these pictures feel it is okay to act this way in public, in front of little kids? But you are right, it does take a lot of time to assemble an investigation like this. Thanks for noticing. We do this because we think it's important that parents know what is really going on, rather than showing up with their kids and learning the hard way.
Are we obsessed with protecting kids? Absolutely. Guilty as charged. But calling that "reprehensible" is a strange take, for sure.
Many people point to the Obergefell decision as the cultural turning point, and there's a case to be made for that, but the push to "queer" the culture goes back far longer. As far as how to walk it back, that's complicated. It's going to take widespread heart-and-worldview change for individuals as well as administrative/legal support for policies that re-establish the preeminence of biological reality over gender ideology and protect children from sexualization.
I never understood why a group of people would make who they have sex with their entire identity.
Thank you for this. Horrible. Will pass it on.
Thank you for sharing!
It’s astounding to me that these people are even having sex, much less with each other. They are physically hideous.
The goal of Gender Theorists is to do away with ALL sexual norms and standards. If they get their way, nothing is wrong.
But when children grow up highly sexualized and used to sex any time, anywhere, and with anyone, they will be victims of obsessive-compulsive behaviors, unable to live ordinary productive lives and enjoying a variety of interests - activities that are needed for a stable society.
This is dead on, and we are seeing the fruits of it already. Kids and young adults have fewer rules regarding sex than ever, their every hormonal whim or confused thought indulged with no judgement (nay, with celebration!), and yet depression, anxiety, and mental illness is skyrocketing. Young people are having a hard time leaving the nest or engaging with basic "adulting." It's terribly sad.
As a lesbian woman, I despise "Pride parades" for some of the reasons listed above and then some. I'm also glad to see "furries" acknowledged as the creepy perverts they are, because I'm tired of hearing that it's all innocent fun. No, it isn't. They're usually porn addicts into incest and zoophilia. It's vile, and I despise being lumped in with them.
However, some of this comes off to me as homophobic, particularly the part about how supporting a hypothetical gay uncle by going to Pride is a "bad reason".
Maybe I'm misreading it, but I'd like to remind everyone that Pride parades didn't used to be like this, and "LGBTQ" does not represent the majority of gays and lesbians anymore.
Pride parades used to be our way of saying we will not be shamed into silence nor hide our natural sexual orientation any longer. We are just like you, we're not degenerates or sinners, and we don't deserve to be denied basic human rights, imprisoned, assaulted, or killed for our sexuality.
However, modern day "Pride parades" are teeming with homophobic straight people (and sadly, some homosexuals and bisexuals too) with sexual fetishes who get sexual gratification from making everyone uncomfortable. Do not conflate us with them. They're the ones making their sexual fetishes (and made up "genders") into their whole identity.
Most of us gays and lesbians are not "kinky" or "deviant" or "sinful" - these perverts just believe we are, so they hijacked our movement and turned it into their public fetish display, sponsored by the nearest Fortune 500.
Also, to the lady holding up the "no book bans" sign - age restrictions on pornographic books are not book bans. You and every other homophobe-in-woke clothing made the public believe we're all creepy perverts again and then you have the audacity to cry "book ban" when parents don't want their 6 year olds reading books about children giving other children blowjobs? Give me a break.
But thanks for making every pedophile organizations dream come true - they've been working on getting adult content into schools since the 1970s! /s
Wow.
Some honest feedback from a gay man who doesn’t care about “pride parades” but who is aware that the Massachusetts Bay Colony originated the death penalty for gay sex, usually called sodomy.
It took an astonishing about of work to convince me that the writer has an astonishing about of time on their hands.
I’d strongly recommend the writer consider why photographing (among other things) women’s breasts to ridicule and publishing them without their consent is a valuable activity to anyone.
This is level of obsession is beyond run-of-the mill prudery. Using children as a pretext for stalking and breathless drooling sexual compendia is… what’s the word…
Reprehensible.
“Massachusetts Informed Parents” indeed.
Hi Sufeitzy,
Rest assured, we didn't photograph anyone, we found all of these pictures publicly posted online. The question you should be asking is, why do the people in these pictures feel it is okay to act this way in public, in front of little kids? But you are right, it does take a lot of time to assemble an investigation like this. Thanks for noticing. We do this because we think it's important that parents know what is really going on, rather than showing up with their kids and learning the hard way.
Are we obsessed with protecting kids? Absolutely. Guilty as charged. But calling that "reprehensible" is a strange take, for sure.
I suppose we can't please everyone.
Deplorable. How the hell did this get normalized so quickly? How does a phenomenon like this get walked back? Honey we sexualized the kids!?
Many people point to the Obergefell decision as the cultural turning point, and there's a case to be made for that, but the push to "queer" the culture goes back far longer. As far as how to walk it back, that's complicated. It's going to take widespread heart-and-worldview change for individuals as well as administrative/legal support for policies that re-establish the preeminence of biological reality over gender ideology and protect children from sexualization.