What research have you done for injuries enacted by cis-gendered players against other cis-gendered players, or are you just targeting transgender students? That video *clearly* does not show an intentional injury, but you worked really hard with your wording to vilify A STUDENT. The only children hurt here are the ones YOU are attacking. Shame on you. Leave the children alone.
Thanks for your comment - although saying that we are the only ones hurting kids when this post literally has a video of a girl being hurt by a much larger male an odd take, to say the least. Whether or not that boy intended to hurt that girl really isn't the point, the point is that MIAA policy allows a physical mismatch that puts girls in danger. The inherent biological differences between males and females is common sense and has been widely accepted by societies across the ages, up until (euphemistically speaking) five minutes ago. The only thing that the fight to protect girls sports has to do with "transgender" students is the fact that the MIAA allows boys to play with girls if they identify as such, but that's the MIAA's issue, not ours. We object to ALL instances of female athletes losing opportunities and being put physically at risk by being forced to compete against larger, stronger males. Whether or not the male 'identifies' as female makes no difference to the girl getting her teeth knocked out, and it makes no difference to us, either. Girls deserve to be protected, period.
What research have you done for injuries enacted by cis-gendered players against other cis-gendered players, or are you just targeting transgender students? That video *clearly* does not show an intentional injury, but you worked really hard with your wording to vilify A STUDENT. The only children hurt here are the ones YOU are attacking. Shame on you. Leave the children alone.
Thanks for your comment - although saying that we are the only ones hurting kids when this post literally has a video of a girl being hurt by a much larger male an odd take, to say the least. Whether or not that boy intended to hurt that girl really isn't the point, the point is that MIAA policy allows a physical mismatch that puts girls in danger. The inherent biological differences between males and females is common sense and has been widely accepted by societies across the ages, up until (euphemistically speaking) five minutes ago. The only thing that the fight to protect girls sports has to do with "transgender" students is the fact that the MIAA allows boys to play with girls if they identify as such, but that's the MIAA's issue, not ours. We object to ALL instances of female athletes losing opportunities and being put physically at risk by being forced to compete against larger, stronger males. Whether or not the male 'identifies' as female makes no difference to the girl getting her teeth knocked out, and it makes no difference to us, either. Girls deserve to be protected, period.