Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brigid LaSage's avatar

Great work, thank you! I'd also like to see legal action to designate gender ideology as a religious/faith based movement that has no place being promoted in our public institutions. Put the LGBTQIA+ zealots on the defensive, not mainstream parents who naturally want to guide their own children's moral development, whether they're religious or not.

As an educator I have seen these beliefs sweep into our schools and take over. Many true believers are nice people who teach this to their own children, which is fine. I get along with lots of people who have different religious beliefs. But why do they get away with forcing this down other people's throats in public schools at taxpayer expense??

If you follow the news from Amherst and Ludlow, you can see that educators are in an impossible position: use the wrong pronouns and you're either an evil indoctrinator or a transphobic bully, and probably soon to be unemployed either way.

It's a religious mania that has entrenched itself as our state religion, in my view, and it will take lawfare to win back our schools and institutions. Thanks again for your important work!

mulhern's avatar

The Supreme Court's ruling took into consideration the age of the children, K - 5. So school districts may be less inclined to respect your request for opt-out for higher grades. Recommended letter is still worth a try, though. Massachusetts has protections for atheists under religion related law. So, if your objection to the teaching of gender ideology is scientific, then you could try just substituting "scientific" for "religious" in the proposed letter and seeing how that goes.

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?